Posts Tagged ‘social media’

Go, Speed, Go (An Addendum to “Dentyne’s Take on the PSA”)

Thursday, September 17th, 2009 - by Colin Ayres

Social Media IconsSince the Industrial Revolution, the world has had a love affair with efficiency. Faster equals more convenient. Today, our affection for speed is more prevalent than ever. Technological advancements, namely the Internet with all its bells and whistles, allow us to consume information and communicate with one another at an unprecedented rate. At this moment, people everywhere are simultaneously answering emails, transferring money, and chatting with friends half way around the world – all via mobile phone. What’s not to love?

John Freeman thinks there’s plenty. Author of The Tyranny of E-mail, he argues “reacting to demands on our time by simply speeding up has canceled out many of the benefits of the Internet.” Moreover, he believes innovation has “isolated us from the people with whom we live” and makes it more difficult to “listen and mean it, to be idle and not fidget.”

Did you hear that? It was the sound of generation X-ers and Y-ers everywhere collectively rolling their eyes. But Freeman’s manifesto for slow communication isn’t without some merit. Since the late 18th century, it seems progress has favored quantity over quality. The most popular means of communication currently are good examples. Take Twitter. Can we really expect to send meaningful messages in just 140 characters? Then there are platforms like Facebook. As more and more people rely on social networking to keep in touch, handshakes are replaced by friend requests and human emotions are reduced to animated emoticons.

It’s a valid argument – relevance has diminished and face-to-face interactions have dwindled. But in the end Freeman’s ideals end up sounding archaic and nostalgic. The web is evolving and social media platforms are the cause. According to Erik Qualman, founder of the theory of Socialnomics™, social media represents a “fundamental shift in the way people interact.” Consider just a sample of his statistical research: Ashton Kutcher and Ellen DeGeneres have more followers than the entire population of Ireland, Norway, and Panama; it only took Facebook nine months to acquire 50 million users (to put it into perspective, it took television 13 years); and there are over 200,000,000 million blogs with more than half of the bloggers posting content or “Tweeting” daily. By the time you finish reading this, those numbers will likely have increased. In short, the world runs – and will continue running – on the web.

The Social Media Revolution depicted by Qualman represents the most significant societal change since the Industrial Revolution. Fast talk is just a byproduct of that evolution. Freeman would warn that the rate at which we communicate is diminishing the value of those communications. Maybe. But the advantages of innovation far outweigh the disadvantages. We are interconnected like never before, seamlessly communicating with friends, families, and colleagues whenever, wherever. Facts, opinions, and information alike flow freely 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Companies that offer real value to consumers scale overnight, while imposters disappear with the blink of an eye. With upsides like those, the revolution can’t turn fast enough.

Watch Erik Qualman’s Socialnomics Video

Read John Freeman’s “Not So Fast”

Dentyne’s Take on the PSA

Wednesday, September 16th, 2009 - by Lindsy Haslam

Technology is an integral part of the way we communicate and brands are always looking for a new way to take advantage of the rise in social media. In 2008, when sales were down 9%, Dentyne was no different. But instead of a fan page on Facebook, an iPhone app, or Twitter updates, the company chose to turn the social media craze on its head.

(more…)

Tweets Speak Volumes

Friday, August 14th, 2009 - by Colin Ayres


Tweets Speak Volumes

We have a saying around here. Everything communicates. Actually, it’s more like a mantra – a pillar of our strategic model and a familiar tune to our clients for sure. It’s simple, really. Everything you do, from the way you answer the phone to advertising, is a reflection of your brand. For better or for worse.

That goes for Twitter, too. Yep, a tweet can say plenty. In fact, with a unique angle (read: you have something interesting to say) and enough followers (read: people are actually interested in what you’re saying), 140 characters are enough to build a brand.

Or, kick it in the groin. Take J.R. Smith, a point guard for the Denver Nuggets. Recently, The Denver Post raised questions about whether his tweets were gang related. Consequently, J.R. pulled the plug on his account to avoid the bad publicity. Then there’s Antonio Cromartie, a defensive back for the San Diego Chargers. He was fined $2,500 for complaining about the food at training camp, claiming the team hasn’t reached the Super Bowl in the last few years due to malnutrition.

It wasn’t long after the two incidents that ESPN issued a memo prohibiting affiliated “personalities” from using Twitter unless it serves the network’s agenda. The call for censorship isn’t surprising when you consider that the athletes are essentially employees of ESPN, a brand with a reputation to maintain among its viewers, a.k.a. customers.

The same goes for your brand. Share insights, answer questions, entertain, and provide links. In short, if you’re going to communicate with customers, be relevant. It will help serve your company’s agenda. But don’t do it without a level of control and thoughtful restrictions. After all, in a world powered by social networking, it doesn’t take much to smear a brand these days. Just a tweet will do.

Time to Claim your Facebook Identity

Monday, June 1st, 2009 - by Chris Hunt

Bandwidth and most likely patience will be tested on Facebook this Friday evening. The world’s #1 social networking site will be allowing users to select vanity URLs starting Friday at 9 PM PST, and a mad dash to claim the most desirable usernames is expected.

MySpace has been using vanity URLs since their launch, as have Twitter and LinkedIn, and the change will certainly make swapping Facebook details easier. Another goal for Facebook might be ranking higher in organic search. Actual names will clearly rank higher than the list of numbers currently occupying individual Facebook pages. Maybe Facebook hopes to sneak ahead of other networks for name or company search results. And those who want to be most searchable should be first in line.

As someone with a very common first name to go with my equally common last name, I may have to be ready as the clock strikes midnight in New York. A future of having a year or birthday or favorite number tacked onto my user name for Facebook eternity doesn’t thrill me. I, along with countless others including the Facebook PR team, will be hoping the level of disappointment is low. Get ready for www.facebook.com/chrishunt729!

http://blog.facebook.com/blog.php?post=90316352130